This is actually not a dissection of the geography, in fact
for “geography” you should substitute any subject. It is an important question,
just why should we teach geography, or maths, or technology? This is not an
article about the curriculum but about leadership and at the heart of this
piece is asking you to understand your own subject, its inherent value, its
place on the timetable, the attitudes of your staff and the reception by
pupils.
If you are interviewed by me it stands a reasonable chance
that you will be asked that question. I have asked this question numerous times
and received a variety of answers, some good, some weak and some that are
downright meaningless.
So why should you justify your subject? It’s on the curriculum
so isn’t that a good enough reason? To use an analogy, we wear our seatbelts
because of concerns for safety rather than because it’s the law. There are a
raft of reasons why you should justify your subject on the curriculum, here are
some of them and I’m sure there are more.
You are appealing to a range of key stake-holders, from
pupils to headteachers and governors. Why should a headteacher agree to running
your GCSE when you can’t give a reasoned justification for the time, resources
and costs the subject will incur? Your subject does not exist in isolation in a
school and by devoting time, staff, resources and money to your subject it is
likely that someone else will get less.
Going back to the original question (for any subject) a
usual answer is the utilitarian, “because it’s useful” answer. I am often
exasperated by this response as it shows very little personal reflection on the
subject. If a subject is “useful” then something you learn will be directly
applicable in later life. I’m not sure how I have used Macbeth, the Sine Rule or
a solid knowledge of the Franco-Prussian War! Very little of what we teach has
direct use in life, were that the case then we would simply offer
apprenticeships for all eleven year olds!
This is an exercise that is worth the time. This could be
the subject of a departmental meeting, it could form the backbone of your
vision, but do consider the original question. It may be that some areas are
directly useful, your subject may develop sets of skills or improve reasoning
ability. It may improve understanding of the society and the world in which we
all live and so help make our pupils better citizens. It may be that it is simply
fascinating or fun! Often for me as a science teacher it is about cultural
significance rather than utilitarian value. Science is a corner stone of modern
culture, it has pushed back our understanding of life and our place in the
Universe, it has driven technology and it poses fascinating questions for the
future. Its history is strewn with fascinating tales of investigation,
discovery and human struggle (and occasionally it is useful).
I want to know that my staff can think about their subjects
as intellectuals engaging in their discipline rather than simply subject
delivery technicians. I want to know that they understand the relevance of
their subject and then I can have the faith in them that the message the pupils
receive is the right one and that the investment is worthwhile.
There is no unique right answer to the original question as
the justification is personal, and it’s your commitment to your vision that matters.
All I would say in conclusion is that make sure you know why you should teach
what you’re teaching.
No comments:
Post a Comment